David Griffin Death, Obituary – Between the years 1973 and 2004, David Ray Griffin was a member of the teaching faculty at both the Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University. His areas of expertise included the philosophical aspects of religious studies as well as theology. Together with his senior, Dr. John Cobb Jr., he established the Center for Process Studies in 1973 as one of the center’s first co-founders.
Griffin has stated that “the task of a theologian is to look at the world from what we would imagine the divine perspective, one that would care about the good of the whole and would love all the parts,” and that this is the “task of a theologian.” Griffin has stated that “the task of a theologian is to look at the world from what we would imagine the divine perspective,” and that this is the “task of a theologian.”
Not only was David an eminent theologian and one of the two most well-known living scholars of Alfred North Whitehead’s process theology (the other being John Cobb), but he also accomplished the following during his lifetime: David was one of the first people to propose the idea that God is a process. Postmodernism, theodicy (the defense of God against evil), primordial truth, panentheism, scientific naturalism, parapsychology, Buddhist thought, and the interaction of the mind and body were all topics that were covered in his works.
In 2004, as he was getting ready to retire, he was approached by a few people who admired his candor and pointed to evidence that the events of September 11 were highly suspicious. These people pointed to evidence that the events of September 11 were highly suspicious. At first, David thought that the attacks of September 11 were merely blowback from the way the United States had dealt with Middle Eastern countries.
However, after conducting additional research on the subject, he came to the conclusion that there was in fact a very serious likelihood that the United States had fabricated the events of September 11 as a false flag operation in order to manufacture consent to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq for their oil. This was the conclusion he reached after coming to the realization that there was a very serious likelihood that the United States had fabricated the events of September 11 as a false flag operation.
This injustice served as the impetus for him to first carry out extensive study on 9/11 and then to subsequently publish twelve scholarly books on the topic. These books, which were not acknowledged in the media but which engaged in a cat-and-mouse game with the purveyors of the official 9/11 narrative, engaged in a cat-and-mouse game with the purveyors of the official 9/11 narrative, who continually adapted their story to cover up the flaws that David tracked and revealed as their tattered narrative unraveled. David tracked and revealed that the official 9/11 narrative was riddled with inconsistencies, such as the